Accelerators

Platform Resilience Assessment

6-week diagnostic that benchmarks recovery capabilities, identifies failure risks, and delivers resilience roadmap linking uptime improvements to revenue protection and compliance.
The Problem

Why Platform Resilience Assessment?

For high-growth companies, availability is existential. Customers expect zero downtime, regulators demand resilience documentation, and every minute of outage costs revenue and trust. Yet most platforms inherit fragmented architectures where teams don't know their true single points of failure, recovery processes rely on tribal knowledge instead of validated playbooks, SLOs exist but aren't tied to incident response workflows, and compliance teams can't prove resilience capabilities when auditors ask. Leadership knows outages are expensive but lacks visibility into whether they're one database failure, DNS misconfiguration, or deployment error away from extended downtime.

Why It's Hard

True platform resilience requires understanding failure modes across infrastructure, applications, and dependencies—then building capabilities to anticipate, absorb, and recover from failures without customer impact. Organizations struggle to baseline their current recovery speed, identify cascading failure risks, validate that failover mechanisms actually work under load, quantify the blast radius of critical component failures, and map compliance requirements (SOX, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR) to resilience practices. Without focused expertise, teams waste months debating chaos engineering vs. disaster recovery planning, implementing redundancy without testing failover, or building incident response processes that collapse during actual outages.

The Accelerator Advantage

This Assessment compresses discovery into 6 weeks. We benchmark resilience maturity, identify single points of failure across platform, pipeline, and runtime, map SLOs to recovery processes and business KPIs, validate existing failover mechanisms, analyze incident response workflows for gaps, and deliver an executive-ready roadmap with recovery playbooks, compliance mapping, and prioritized modernization initiatives—so teams recover faster from failures, leadership sees clear revenue protection, and compliance becomes evidence-based instead of aspirational.

‍

Benefits and Metrics

20-50%
reduction in MTTR through validated recovery workflows
2x
faster recovery from service-impacting events
Stronger
compliance posture with evidence-based resilience documentation

Partner Certifications

THE SOLUTION

What's Included

Every Platform Resilience Assessment follows a proven 6-week framework designed to baseline recovery capabilities, expose failure risks, and prioritize resilience investments that protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and reduce operational chaos during incidents.
Discovery & Benchmarking
  • Stakeholder interviews across SRE, platform, security, and compliance teams
  • Current architecture mapping with dependency analysis
  • Resilience maturity baseline across infrastructure, application, and process domains
  • SLO/SLA inventory and business impact mapping
  • Incident history analysis (frequency, MTTR, root causes, blast radius)
  • Failover mechanism identification and validation status review
  • Compliance requirement mapping (SOX, PCI, HIPAA, GDPR resilience controls)
Deliverables
  • Resilience maturity scorecard (0-5 scale) across key domains
  • Risk heatmap identifying single points of failure and potential blast radius
  • SLO-driven recovery playbook with actionable workflows and failover designs
  • Incident response gap analysis and recommended improvements
  • Compliance mapping linking resilience practices to regulatory requirements
  • Modernization roadmap with 6-12 month sequencing, effort estimates, and ROI projections
  • Executive presentation connecting resilience investments to revenue protection and compliance readiness
Outcomes
  • 20-50% reduction in Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)
  • 2x faster recovery from service-impacting events
  • Clear visibility into failure risks and cascading impact scenarios
  • Validated failover mechanisms with documented recovery procedures
  • Stronger compliance posture with evidence-based resilience documentation
  • Direct linkage between resilience practices and revenue protection
  • Operational alignment on ownership, escalation, and recovery workflows
FAQ

Common Questions

See All FAQs
What happens after this Assessment?"

Three options: (1) Execute resilience improvements yourself using our playbooks, risk heatmap, and roadmap, (2) Engage us to implement high-priority initiatives like failover validation, incident response workflow improvements, or chaos engineering programs, or (3) Embed a Platform Reliability TechPod for continuous resilience improvement and operational support. Most clients choose option 2 to prove ROI on specific improvements—typically starting with eliminating highest-risk single points of failure or implementing automated failover for critical services—before committing to broader resilience programs.

Do we need to run chaos engineering experiments?

Not necessarily during the assessment. We evaluate your current failover mechanisms, incident history, and recovery processes to identify risks without injecting failures into production. If chaos engineering would add value—for example, validating that your multi-region failover actually works under realistic conditions—we'll recommend it in the roadmap with specific experiment designs. Many organizations benefit more from fixing known single points of failure and documenting recovery procedures before introducing controlled chaos.

How does this differ from disaster recovery planning?

Disaster recovery (DR) focuses on recovering from catastrophic failures like data center loss. Platform resilience is broader—it covers DR plus everyday failure modes like service degradation, dependency failures, cascading errors, and operational mistakes that cause outages. We assess whether your platform can absorb failures gracefully, whether teams know how to recover quickly when absorption fails, and whether you have evidence that your recovery mechanisms actually work. DR is one component of resilience, not the complete picture.

What if we already have SLOs and incident response processes?

Most companies have these in place. We assess whether they're effective: Are SLOs tied to customer experience or just technical metrics? Do incident response processes work under pressure or do they collapse during major outages? Are failover mechanisms validated or assumed to work? Do compliance teams have evidence to demonstrate resilience controls during audits? Often the issue isn't absence of resilience practices—it's that they're not tested, documented, or connected to business outcomes and compliance requirements.

How quickly can we start?

Most Platform Resilience Assessments kick off within 2 weeks of signing. Week 1 requires stakeholder availability for interviews and access to architecture documentation, incident history, and monitoring systems. We don't make changes to production systems during the assessment—just analyze current state, validate assumptions about failover mechanisms through documentation review and testing if safe, and deliver recommendations teams can execute with confidence.