Accelerators

Observability Maturity Assessment

A diagnostic that exposes blind spots, quantifies tool sprawl, and delivers a pragmatic roadmap for unified observability including measurable improvements in MTTR, detection, and costs.
Request This Accelerator
Get a Free Diagnostic
The Problem

Why Observability Maturity Assessment?

Most scaling companies inherit fragmented monitoring across infrastructure, applications, and business telemetry. Teams run multiple tools that don't talk to each other, leading to blind spots during incidents, slow mean-time-to-resolve, duplicated vendor spend, and release processes that rely on hope instead of data. Leadership knows observability matters but lacks a clear picture of where the gaps are or what fixing them would actually cost.

Why It's Hard

Observability isn't just about collecting metrics—it requires unified telemetry pipelines, well-defined SLOs tied to business outcomes, and alert strategies that surface real problems without overwhelming teams. Without focused expertise, organizations add more tools to patch gaps, creating deeper silos and higher costs. Teams waste months debating vendors or implementing dashboards that don't connect to the workflows engineers actually use during incidents.

The Accelerator Advantage

This Assessment compresses discovery into 6 weeks. We benchmark your telemetry maturity, map current vs. target observability architecture, quantify tool sprawl and monitoring spend, and deliver an executive-ready roadmap with prioritized improvements—so teams get faster incident resolution, leadership gets cost clarity, and releases become predictable instead of risky.

Benefits and Metrics

2x
faster MTTR through unified observability architecture
25-40%
fewer blind-spot incidents with comprehensive telemetry coverage
15-30%
reduced monitoring costs from tool consolidation and optimization

Partner Certifications

See Our Partners
THE SOLUTION

What's Included

Every Observability Maturity Assessment follows a proven 6-week framework designed to surface gaps, quantify waste, and create a roadmap that ties observability improvements directly to business resilience and cost efficiency.
Discovery & Benchmarking
  • Stakeholder interviews across SRE, platform, product, and engineering teams
  • Telemetry coverage analysis (metrics, logs, traces, user experience)
  • Tool inventory and ownership mapping
  • MTTR and incident detection latency baselining
  • SLO/SLA practice assessment and gap analysis
Deliverables
  • Maturity scorecard (0-5 scale) across infrastructure, application, and business observability
  • Current vs. target observability architecture map
  • Tool consolidation roadmap and cost baseline analysis
  • SLO-driven release gate recommendations
  • Alert tuning and noise reduction playbook
  • Executive presentation linking telemetry modernization to business outcomes
Outcomes
  • 2x faster MTTR through unified observability
  • 25-40% reduction in blind-spot incidents
  • 15-30% lower monitoring and tooling spend
  • Release confidence backed by data-driven SLO gates
  • Clear ownership model and triage workflows
  • Foundation for scaling observability without scaling costs
Case Studies

Proof in the results

This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.
Life360
From Weeks to Days: How Real-Time Observability Transformed Infrastructure Velocity
How Life360 replaced legacy monitoring with full-stack Datadog observability, accelerating deployments and enabling confident, data-driven infrastructure decisions.
Read case study
See Case Studies
FAQ

Common Questions

See All FAQs
What happens after this Assessment?

Three options: (1) Execute improvements yourself using our roadmap and playbooks, (2) Engage us to deliver high-priority initiatives like tool consolidation or SLO implementation, or (3) Embed an Observability TechPod for continuous improvement and operational support. Most clients choose option 2 to prove ROI on specific improvements before committing to long-term programs.

Do we need to choose observability tools first?

No—that's part of what we assess. We evaluate your current stack (Datadog, Grafana, Splunk, cloud-native tools, etc.) and recommend consolidation or expansion based on coverage gaps, cost efficiency, and team workflows. We're tool-agnostic and focused on what works for your environment, not vendor roadmaps.

What if we already have DataDog or similar platforms deployed?

Most companies have tools deployed but aren't getting full value. We assess coverage gaps (missing traces, uninstrumented services, orphaned dashboards), alert quality (noise vs. signal), SLO maturity, and cost efficiency. Often the issue isn't the tool—it's adoption, configuration, or ownership models.

‍

How is this different from vendor professional services?

Vendor services optimize for their platform. We optimize for your outcomes—resilience, cost efficiency, team velocity. If that means consolidating onto one vendor, great. If it means hybrid observability or filling gaps with open-source tools, we'll tell you. Our recommendations are grounded in operational reality, not sales quotas.

How quickly can we start?

Most Observability Maturity Assessments kick off within 2 weeks of signing. Week 1 requires stakeholder availability for interviews and tool access for discovery. Beyond that, ramp-up is minimal. We know exactly what data we need to baseline your current state and move fast.